All issues · Energy & Environment · No. 14

Domestic Energy Production

How should a country balance affordable, reliable energy against environmental and climate costs?

The US produces energy from oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, hydro, wind, and solar. Each carries a different mix of cost, reliability, emissions, land use, and security implications, and the grid must balance supply and demand continuously.

Electricity must be generated at the moment it is consumed. Sources that produce on demand are described as dispatchable; wind and solar are not, which makes storage, transmission, and backup capacity central to any high-renewable system.

Nuclear power generates large amounts of carbon-free electricity continuously but faces high capital costs, long construction timelines, and unresolved long-term waste storage. It divides both environmental and business constituencies.

Permitting and transmission constraints affect all sources. Projects of every type, including renewables, pipelines, and transmission lines, face multi-year approval processes and local opposition.

The positionsFind your officials →

POSITION 1 / 3

Expand conventional production

Abundant domestic oil, gas, and coal deliver affordable, reliable energy and strategic independence.

Natural gas provides dispatchable power that stabilizes grids with variable renewables.
Domestic production supports employment and reduces reliance on foreign suppliers.
Energy exports give allies alternatives to adversarial suppliers.
Low energy costs are a competitive advantage for domestic manufacturing.

POSITION 2 / 3

Accelerate renewables

Wind and solar are now the cheapest new generation in many markets, and scaling them is the fastest path to lower emissions.

Costs have fallen dramatically and continue to decline.
Fuel price volatility does not affect wind and solar operating costs.
Distributed generation and storage can improve resilience.
Construction and installation employ large numbers of workers.

POSITION 3 / 3

All-of-the-above with nuclear

Reliable, low-carbon power at scale requires nuclear alongside renewables, and permitting reform matters more than any single source.

Nuclear provides continuous carbon-free generation independent of weather.
Diversity of sources reduces exposure to any single failure mode.
Transmission buildout is the binding constraint on renewable expansion.
Advanced reactor designs aim to address cost and safety concerns.

Terms you will hearFind your officials →

Dispatchable: Generation that can be increased or decreased on demand.
Baseload: Continuous generation meeting minimum constant demand.
Capacity factor: Actual output as a share of theoretical maximum output.
Grid interconnection queue: The backlog of projects awaiting approval to connect to the transmission system.

What people actually disagree aboutFind your officials →

What level of reliability should the grid guarantee, and at what cost?
Should permitting be streamlined for all energy projects or only some?
Is nuclear power a climate solution or an unacceptable risk and expense?

Do something about itFind your officials →

Know where you stand? The people who actually vote on this are reachable, and a message in your own words carries more weight than a form letter.

Find your officials →

Was this page balanced?

We are not asking whether you agree with any position — only whether each one was stated fairly. That is the standard this site is built to meet.

Think a position here is stated unfairly? Tell us what an advocate for that view would say instead.